A few brief lessons ...

 ... from November's cases so far:

  • CAFA has not changed the rule that a counterclaim cannot confer federal jurisdiction.  Resurgent Capital Servs., LP v. Thomason, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (W.D. Mo. Nov. 5, 2012) (remanding case).
  • Courts get suspicious when parties widen the scope of a class action during settlement negotiations.  Smith v. Levine Leichtman Capital Partners, Inc., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163672 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2012) (denying approval of settlement).
  • If you're going to settle a class action, you still need a workable class definition.  Supler v. FKAACS, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159210 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 6, 2012) (denying preliminary approval of settlement).

 

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.classactioncountermeasures.com/admin/trackback/289884
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.





Blog Author

Andrew J. Trask

photo of Andrew J. Trask Andrew Trask has defended more than 100 class actions, involving all stages of the litigation process. While his work hasMore...

Twitter Feed

@classstrategist McGuireWoods' Most Recent Twitter Posts